Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Skilled Person report relating to governance of an overseas owned UK investment bank

Background

Our client is an overseas owned UK investment bank under a regulator mandated review. 

The UK FS regulator had a concern that the shareholders of an overseas owned UK investment bank might have undue influence over the management of the firm. This might be open (through shareholder representatives on the Board) or hidden (through influence over key Board members).

The scope of our work was mandated by the regulator and required a Skilled Person to report on both the general governance and oversight arrangements at the firm, and any indications of undue open or hidden shareholder influence.

Our work

We assembled a team based on the specific nature of the regulator concern, as well as the general governance and oversight assessment. This team included several senior staff with extensive experience of Board assessment work, and cross disciplinary competence:

  • UK general corporate governance guidance and best practice;
  • UK financial services regulatory governance requirements; and
  • Organisational development / culture professionals.

We adopted a strictly evidence-based approach to the assessment, which included document reviews, interviews with key officers, managers and staff, and live observation of Board and governance committee meetings over a period of several months.

We triangulated the results of these various sources of evidence to arrive at robust conclusions supported by clear evidence.

Outcomes

We were able to reassure the regulator that there was no evidence of inappropriate shareholder influence, and that the firm’s strategy and key decisions were based on robust Board and executive governance operating transparently. While there were some opportunities to enhance processes, there were no serious defects requiring further regulatory intervention.